The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi

Author:

POSNER DANIEL N.

Abstract

This paper explores the conditions under which cultural cleavages become politically salient. It does so by taking advantage of the natural experiment afforded by the division of the Chewa and Tumbuka peoples by the border between Zambia and Malawi. I document that, while the objective cultural differences between Chewas and Tumbukas on both sides of the border are identical, the political salience of the division between these communities is altogether different. I argue that this difference stems from the different sizes of the Chewa and Tumbuka communities in each country relative to each country's national political arena. In Malawi, Chewas and Tumbukas are each large groups vis-à-vis the country as a whole and, thus, serve as viable bases for political coalition-building. In Zambia, Chewas and Tumbukas are small relative to the country as a whole and, thus, not useful to mobilize as bases of political support. The analysis suggests that the political salience of a cultural cleavage depends not on the nature of the cleavage itself (since it is identical in both countries) but on the sizes of the groups it defines and whether or not they will be useful vehicles for political competition.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference59 articles.

1. Vail Leroy , and Landeg White .1989.“Tribalism in the Political History of Malawi.”In The Creation of Tribalism in Southern Africa,ed. Leroy Vail .Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press,151–92.

2. Lijphart Arend .1977.Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.

3. Gurr Ted Robert .2000.Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century.Washington, DC:U.S. Institute of Peace.

4. Snelson Peter .1974.Educational Development in Northern Rhodesia: 1883–1945.Lusaka:Kenneth Kaunda Foundation.

5. Fearon James D. , and David D. Laitin .1996.“Explaining Interethnic Cooperation.”American Political Science Review 90 (December):715–35.

Cited by 569 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Explaining change in linguistic voting: The case of Catalonia;Nations and Nationalism;2024-08-12

2. Estonian Russians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09

3. Slovak Hungarians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09

4. Ethnicity and Democratic Resilience Individual Analyses;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09

5. Ethnicity and New Issues;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3