Abstract
This paper explores the conditions under which cultural cleavages become politically salient. It does so by taking advantage of the natural experiment afforded by the division of the Chewa and Tumbuka peoples by the border between Zambia and Malawi. I document that, while the objective cultural differences between Chewas and Tumbukas on both sides of the border are identical, the political salience of the division between these communities is altogether different. I argue that this difference stems from the different sizes of the Chewa and Tumbuka communities in each country relative to each country's national political arena. In Malawi, Chewas and Tumbukas are each large groups vis-à-vis the country as a whole and, thus, serve as viable bases for political coalition-building. In Zambia, Chewas and Tumbukas are small relative to the country as a whole and, thus, not useful to mobilize as bases of political support. The analysis suggests that the political salience of a cultural cleavage depends not on the nature of the cleavage itself (since it is identical in both countries) but on the sizes of the groups it defines and whether or not they will be useful vehicles for political competition.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference59 articles.
1. Vail Leroy , and Landeg White .1989.“Tribalism in the Political History of Malawi.”In The Creation of Tribalism in Southern Africa,ed. Leroy Vail .Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press,151–92.
2. Lijphart Arend .1977.Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
3. Gurr Ted Robert .2000.Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century.Washington, DC:U.S. Institute of Peace.
4. Snelson Peter .1974.Educational Development in Northern Rhodesia: 1883–1945.Lusaka:Kenneth Kaunda Foundation.
5. Fearon James D. , and David D. Laitin .1996.“Explaining Interethnic Cooperation.”American Political Science Review 90 (December):715–35.
Cited by
569 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Explaining change in linguistic voting: The case of Catalonia;Nations and Nationalism;2024-08-12
2. Estonian Russians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
3. Slovak Hungarians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
4. Ethnicity and Democratic Resilience Individual Analyses;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
5. Ethnicity and New Issues;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09