International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization

Author:

DAVIS CHRISTINA L.

Abstract

This article explains how the institutional context of international negotiations influences their outcomes. I argue that issue linkage counteracts domestic obstacles to liberalization by broadening the negotiation stakes. Institutions bolster the credibility of the linkage to make it more effective. I test the argument in the agricultural sector, which has been among the most difficult sectors for governments to liberalize. Statistical analysis of U.S. negotiations with Japan and the EU from 1970 to 1999 indicates that an institutionalized linkage between agricultural and industrial issues encourages agricultural liberalization in both Japan and Europe. Through case studies of key negotiations, I first examine why countries choose to link issues, then show how the linkage changes interest group mobilization and shifts the policy process to promote liberalization.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference78 articles.

1. Vahl Remco .1997 Leadership in Disguise: The Role of the European Commission in EC Decision-Making on Agriculture in the Uruguay Round.Aldershot, England:Ashgate.

2. Tangermann Stefan .1996“An Ex-Post Review of the 1992 MacSharry Reform.”Paper prepared for the conference CAP Reform: What Next?Nottingham, UK.

3. Sebenius James .1983“Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties.”International Organization 37 (2):281–316.

4. Tollison Robert D. , and Thomas D. Willett .1979“An Economic Theory of Mutually Advantageous Issue Linkages in International Negotiations.”International Organization 33 (4):425–49.

5. Zeng Ka .2002“Trade Structure and the Effectiveness of America's “Aggressively Unilatera.” Trade Policy.”International Studies Quarterly 46:93–115.

Cited by 189 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3