Author:
MUTZ DIANA C.,REEVES BYRON
Abstract
Does incivility in political discourse have adverse effects on public regard for politics? If so, why? In this study we present a theory suggesting that when viewers are exposed to televised political disagreement, it often violates well-established face-to-face social norms for the polite expression of opposing views. As a result, incivility in public discourse adversely affects trust in government. Drawing on three laboratory experiments, we find that televised presentations of political differences of opinion do not, in and of themselves, harm attitudes toward politics and politicians. However, political trust is adversely affected by levels ofincivilityin these exchanges. Our findings suggest that the format of much political television effectively promotes viewer interest, but at the expense of political trust.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Brown Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson .1987.Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.New York:Cambridge University Press.
2. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence
3. Dawson Michael E. , Anne M. Schell , and Diane L. Filion .2000.“The Electrodermal System.”In Handbook of Psychophysiology, 2nd ed.,ed. John T. Cacioppo , Louis G. Tassinary , and Gary G. Berntson .New York:Cambridge University Press.
4. Reeves Byron and Clifford Nass .1996.The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers,Television and New Media Like Real People and Places.New York:Cambridge University Press. Reeves Byron , Annie Lang , Eun-Young Kim , and Deborah Tatar .1999. “The Effects of Screen Size and Message Content on Arousal and Attention.” Media Psychology 1: 49–67.
5. Hetherington Marc J .1999.“The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote, 1968–96.”American Political Science Review 93 (June):311–26.
Cited by
598 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献