Abstract
Investigating reports of marginalization from Congresswomen of color, I examine legislative practices in the 103rd and 104th Congresses to illuminate dynamics that structure hierarchies on the basis of race and gender. I advance an account of racing–gendering as a political process that silences, stereotypes, enforces invisibility, excludes, and challenges the epistemic authority of Congresswomen of color. Racing–gendering constitutes a form of interested bias operating in Congress, which has important implications for understandings of the internal operations of political institutions, the policy priorities of Congresswomen of color, the substantive representation of historically underrepresented groups, and the practice of democracy in the United States.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference128 articles.
1. Jackson Lee Sheila. 1995 Congressional Record,104th Cong., 1st sess., p. H3872, March 28.
2. Fenno Richard F. Jr. 1973 Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
3. Taylor Rupert. 1996 Political Science Encounters ‘Race' and ‘Ethnicity. Racial and Ethnic Studies 19 (October): 884–95.
4. Kingdon John. 1984 Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston Little, Brown
5. Meek Carrie. 1995a Center for American Women and Politics Interview, June 27.
Cited by
351 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Appendix;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
2. Women’s Inclusion and Political Violence;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
3. Solving the Concept Stretching Problem;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
4. Notes;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
5. Conclusion;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13