Abstract
ArgumentFollowing an international trend, Italy has reformed its university system, especially concerning methods and tools for research evaluation, which are increasingly focused on a number of bibliometric indexes. To study the effects of these changes, we analyze the changing profiles of economists who have won competitions for full professorship in the last few decades in the country. We concentrate on individual characteristics and on scientific production. We show that the identification of a univocal and standardized concept of “research quality” within the new research assessments has progressively imposed a strategy of “homologation,” especially for women. We find that women economists are at a higher risk of discrimination than their male colleagues and thus they are more likely to conform their research activities to the standardized profile imposed by the gender-blind application of simplistic bibliometric methods.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences
Reference81 articles.
1. Zacchia, Giulia . 2017. “Diversity in Economics: A Gender Analysis of Italian Academic Production.” INET WP 61 https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/WP_61-Zacchia-Diversity-Final.pdf (last accessed January 14, 2020).
2. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track
3. Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development
4. Stockhammer, Engelbert , Dammerer, Quirin , and Kapur, Sukriti . 2017. “The Research Excellence Framework 2014, Journal Ratings and the Marginalization of Heterodox Economics.” Working papers Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES):1715.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献