Abstract
ArgumentThe paper explores Hermann Weyl’s turn to intuitionism through a philosophical prism of normative framework transitions. It focuses on three central themes that occupied Weyl’s thought: the notion of the continuum, logical existence, and the necessity of intuitionism, constructivism, and formalism to adequately address the foundational crisis of mathematics. The analysis of these themes reveals Weyl’s continuous endeavor to deal with such fundamental problems and suggests a view that provides a different perspective concerning Weyl’s wavering foundational positions. Building on a philosophical model of scientific framework transitions and the special role that normative indecision or ambivalence plays in the process, the paper examines Weyl’s motives for considering such a radical shift in the first place. It concludes by showing that Weyl’s shifting stances should be regarded as symptoms of a deep, convoluted intrapersonal process of self-deliberation induced by exposure to external criticism.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences
Reference68 articles.
1. Did Brouwer’s Intuitionistic Analysis Satisfy Its Own Epistemological Standards?
2. van Atten, Mark . 2017. “Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/brouwer/ (last accessed July 1st, 2019).