Author:
Jacob Ulrike,Brust Oliver A.
Abstract
ArgumentRecurring economic crises, like the one of 2007-2008, led to criticism of economic research and a demand to develop new strategies to avoid them. Standard economic theories use conventional approaches to deal with economic challenges, heterodox theories try to develop alternatives with which to face them. It remains unclear whether the 2007-2008 crisis led to a change in economic research as well as to a consideration of alternative approaches. We used co-word analysis to map the structure of economic research in Germany between 2005 and 2014. Core topics within economic research, such as “market” or “production” hardly shift and can be linked to standard economic theories. Peripheral topics such as “inequality” or “unemployment” show greater dynamics. However, only a few of these topics can be linked to heterodox approaches. Certain changes have occurred in reaction to the 2007-2008 crisis. However, the unchanged importance of standard economic topics raises the question whether these changes are sufficient to face coming economic challenges.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences
Reference76 articles.
1. Macroeconometric Models
2. Soziale Kohärenz und Innovativität: Struktureffekte zur Akzeptanz neuer Themen in sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschungsfeldern.;Renner;Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie,1997
3. 35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献