Abstract
As funding for research in British universities is now dependent upon an assessment of research productivity (made every four years), departments of architecture are finding that design, which used to be considered as the equivalent of research for architectural teachers, may not be regarded as such for the purposes of this assessment. The arguments both for and against considering design as a research activity are discussed, as is the need for a recognised way of grading the quality of work. Suggestions are made for the direction in which design as research in schools of architecture might take.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Architecture
Reference5 articles.
1. British Architects: accommodating science and technical information;Cole;Journal of Architecture and Planning Research,1988
2. Lionel March – three sketches;Stiny;Environment and Planning B,1994
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献