Author:
Skocpol Theda,Ritter Gretchen
Abstract
Comparative research on the origins of modern welfare states typically asks why certain European nations, including Great Britain, enacted pensions and social insurance between the 1880s and the 1920s, while the United States “lagged behind,” that is did not establish such policies for the entire nation until the Social Security Act of 1935. To put the question this way overlooks the social policies that were distinctive to the early twentieth-century United States. During the period when major European nations, including Britain, were launching paternalist versions of the modern welfare state, the United States was tentatively experimenting with what might be called a maternalist welfare state. In Britain, male bureaucrats and party leaders designed policies “for the good” of male wage-workers and their dependents. Meanwhile, in the United States, early social policies were championed by elite and middle-class women “for the good” of less privileged women. Adult American women were helped as mothers, or as working women who deserved special protection because they were potential mothers.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Assessing Exceptionalism: More but Different Cross-National Comparisons;Studies in American Political Development;2022-07-29
2. Inching Toward Universal Coverage: State-Federal Health-Care Programs in Historical Perspective;Journal of Policy History;2015-08-24
3. Appendix;Reconciling Work and Poverty Reduction;2014-01-09
4. Contributors;Reconciling Work and Poverty Reduction;2014-01-09
5. Copyright Page;Reconciling Work and Poverty Reduction;2014-01-09