Abstract
The following remarks are intended to show that there exists no irreconcilable conflict between C. Just. 3.32.22 and C. Theod. 4.18.1. This is a strictly limited purpose, and the author does not propose to attempt any further conclusions as to the complicated history of the restoration of fruits in the rei vindicatio. It may be well to quote the two texts that form the subject of this article.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference28 articles.
1. Op. cit., pp. 583 f.
2. Op. cit., p. 226
3. Czyhlarz , op. cit., p. 563
4. Handlexikon, 9th ed., 1907, p. 258
5. Op. cit., p. 338, n. 4.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sachenrecht;Rechts- und Staatswissenschaften;1950