Abstract
AbstractCensure, blame and harms are central concepts in sentencing that have evolved over the years to take into account social context and experiential knowledge. Flexibility, however, remains limited as the current analysis in sentencing focuses on the offender while failing to engage with the state's contribution in creating wrongs and harms. This risks giving rise to defective practices of responsibility since the state can also contribute to their production. The following article presents a complementary and additional framework within sentencing to account for state censure, blame and harms. The framework is rooted in communicative theories of punishment that integrate a responsive understanding of censure and a relational account of responsibility.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference4 articles.
1. Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales: Recent Developments and Emerging Issues;Roberts;Law and Contemporary Problems,2013
2. Proportionate Sentencing
3. Indigenous Incarceration: Time for a Pragmatic Solution – Sentencing Discounts and Retrospective Reductions in Prison Terms;Bagaric;Crim. L.J.,2019
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献