Abstract
The fossil record contains far more coprolites produced by carnivorous animals than by herbivores. This inequity reflects the fact that feces generated by diets of flesh and bone (and other skeletal materials) contain chemical constituents that may precipitate out under certain conditions as permineralizing phosphates. Thus, although coprolites are usually less common than fossil bones, they provide a significant source of information about ancient patterns of predation. The identity of a coprolite producer often remains unresolved, but fossil feces can provide new perspectives on prey selection patterns, digestive efficiency, and the occurrence of previously unknown taxa in a paleoecosystem. Dietary residues are often embedded in the interior of coprolites, but much can be learned from analyses of intact specimens. When ample material is available, however, destructive analyses such as petrography or coprolite dissolution may be used to extract additional paleobiological information.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference29 articles.
1. An Oligocene snake from a coprolite;Parris;Herpetologica,1978
2. The first record of spiral coprolites from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Judith River Group, Upper Cretaceous) southern Alberta, Canada
3. Freshwater ostracodes from Late Triassic coprolites in Central India;Sohn;Journal of Paleontology,1979
4. Coprolites of White River (Oligocene) carnivorous mammals: origin and paleoecological significance;Edwards;Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming,1974
5. Coprolites: an annotated bibliography;Hantzschel;Geological Society of America Memoir,1968
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献