Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
The researcher’s centre was in a unique position of merging with another established radiotherapy centre to create a Satellite Site. It was noted that the Satellite Site delivered more fractions per linac within the same working day profile as the Main Site. Subtle differences in the workflows allowed for an appraisal of the processes within a fraction of radiotherapy and how this can be refined to improve efficiency.
Methods:
Retrospective fraction timings were collected using the Oncology Information System for 98 breast and prostate treatments at both sites. A literature review was also conducted to further explore factors that impact fraction timings in other departments internationally.
Results:
Breast and prostate treatments took 2·1 and 2·93 minutes, respectively, longer to deliver at the Main Site. Set-up to the isocentre and verification image assessment took significantly longer in all cases at the Main Site. Literature surrounding efficiency is scarce but suggests methods used for online management of verification imaging significantly impacts appointment times.
Conclusion:
Implementation of a paperless workflow and process improvements for image assessment such as introducing a traffic light protocol may reduce the time to deliver a fraction of radiotherapy and maximise service efficiency.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Oncology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference16 articles.
1. 1. Public Health England. Radiotherapy activity across England, 2017. http://www.ncin.org.uk/view?rid=3426. Accessed on 6th June 2020.
2. Process evaluation of treatment times in a large radiotherapy department
3. Workflow management in radiation oncology: the impact on a high volume department;Miriyala;Br J Heal Care Manag,2018
4. Patterns of Practice in Canadian Radiation Treatment Centres: Results of a National Survey
5. Examining Radiation Treatment Appointment Times at a Canadian Cancer Centre: A Timing Study