Abstract
AbstractThis article refines a foundational tenet of rational choice theory known as the principle of description invariance. Attempts to apply this principle to human agents with imperfect knowledge have paid insufficient attention to two aspects: first, agents’ epistemic situations, i.e. whether and when they recognize alternative descriptions of an object to be equivalent; and second, the individuation of objects of description, i.e. whether and when objects count as the same or different. An important consequence is that many apparent ‘framing effects’ may not violate the principle of description invariance, and the subjects of these effects may not be irrational.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Reference21 articles.
1. Frames, reasons, and rationality;Fisher;International Journal of Philosophical Studies,2022
2. Simmons, J. and Nelson, L. 2013. “Exactly”: The most famous framing effect is robust to precise wording. http://datacolada.org/11.
3. Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects;Stanovich;Thinking and Reasoning,1998
4. Credible conceptions and implausible probabilities;MacDonald;British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,1986
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献