Abstract
AbstractThis article asks whether firms should contribute to the costs of procreation and parenthood. We explore two sets of arguments. First, we ask what the principle of fair play – central in parental justice debates – implies. We argue that if one defends a pro-sharing view, firms are required to shoulder part of the costs of procreation and parenthood. Second, we turn to the principle of fair equality of opportunity. We argue that compensating firms for costs they incur because their employees decide to procreate or parent may undermine some of the incentives leading to (statistical) discrimination in the workplace.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Reference65 articles.
1. Being a Parent or Having a Parent? The Perceived Employability of Men and Women Who Take Employment Leave
2. Equality, personal responsibility, and gender socialisation;Mason;Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,2000
3. Privacy and organizational persons;Orts;Minnesota Law Review,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conscientious objection in firms;Economics and Philosophy;2021-04-20