Abstract
Abstract:According to some accounts of exploitation, most notably Ruth Sample’s (2003) degradation-based account and Robert Goodin’s (1987) vulnerability-based account, exploitation occurs when an advantaged party fails to constrain their advantage in light of another’s disadvantage, regardless of the cause of this disadvantage. Because the duty of constraint in these accounts does not depend on the cause of the disadvantage, the advantaged’s duty of constraint is what I call a ‘come-what-may’ duty. I show that come-what-may duties create moral hazards that can themselves be exploited by the disadvantaged parties. In such cases these accounts of exploitation are either self-frustrating or over-demanding.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. From the Other Side: Supervisor Perspectives on Paid Versus Unpaid Sport Management Internships;Sport Management Education Journal;2024
2. Sweatshops, Exploitation, and the Nonworseness Claim;Business Ethics Quarterly;2022-06-21
3. Exploitation and Consumption;The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics;2021-10-12
4. Territorial rights and colonial wrongs;European Journal of Philosophy;2020-09-23
5. Are we all exploiters?*;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2020-09-03