Abstract
AbstractEven where willingness-to-pay as a measure of welfare impact is adjusted for diminishing marginal utility, welfare economics is shown to favour policies that add to the life expectancy or that enhance the quality of life of persons who are already better-off. I propose an alternative, Equal Respect methodology, under an axiomatic claim that at the point of decision the prospective life years of all individuals are of equal intrinsic social value. This justifies equal valuation of risk mitigation across all persons; similarly, all appraised impacts should be scaled to accord equal respect to difficult but no-less-valuable lives.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Reference35 articles.
1. Interpersonal aggregation and partial comparability;Sen;Econometrica,1970
2. Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment
3. Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis
4. Does the choice of numéraire matter in cost-benefit analysis?;Johansson;Journal of Public Economics,1998
5. The value of health and longevity;Murphy;NBER Working Paper,2005
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献