Abstract
AbstractThis article contributes to the debate about the future of just war thinking, which has been challenged by the emerging school of just peace. Just peace thinkers hope that by foregrounding nonviolent means just war reasoning will become obsolete. Recently, the German Catholic Bishops have argued that the traditional understanding of just war contributed to their predecessors' silence on the Second World War. Grounded in just peace thinking, their argument implies that had the new framework been in place at the time, it would have been easier for their predecessors to oppose Hitler's war. In this article, I defend traditional just war thinking as encountered in the thought of Thomas Aquinas. For Aquinas, just war thinking was part of an encompassing ethics of war and peace. In fact, peace was the primary goal. Grounded in Aquinas's understanding of virtue, I argue that there is a place for just peace scholarship within the just war framework. The tools of nonviolence should be seen as an important complement to the justifiable use of armed force.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Philosophy
Reference74 articles.
1. Growing Edges of Just War Theory: Jus ante bellum, jus post bellum, and Imperfect Justice
2. The Just War Tradition and the Question of Authority
3. Die deutschen Bischöfe. 2022. “Erklärung der deutschen Bischofskonferenz zum Krieg in der Ukraine.” Available at https://www.dbk.de/fileadmin/redaktion/diverse_downloads/presse_2022/2022-034a-Anlage1-FVV-Vierzehnheiligen-Pressebericht_Ukraine-Erklärung.pdf. Accessed 25 March, 2022.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献