Abstract
Abstract
This article aims to illuminate absences in the semiotic landscape of Crimea, resulting from the erasure of Ukraine after Russia's occupation of Crimea in 2014. By foregrounding what is not there, the study expands semiotic landscapes studies and critical sociolinguistic research more generally by interrogating absence and its haunting effects. More than 3,500 photographs of semiotic landscapes collected over two months of fieldwork between 2017 and 2019 together with fieldnotes serve as ethnographic data. The production of absence is interrogated through an analysis of its material effects, that is, voids, holes, and blank walls. It concludes that erasure does not simply negate Ukraine. Instead, pasts remain present, visible, and audible in semiotic landscapes. Absences, as part of a relational ontology of materiality, discourse, and affect, shout about complex invisibilized histories of violence. In this way, they suggest the need to probe traditional approaches in semiotic landscape research that rely on an ontology of presence. (Absence, trace, materiality, ghost, spectre, haunting, Crimea, Ukraine, semiotic landscape, linguistic landscape, interdiscursivity)*
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Language and Linguistics
Reference58 articles.
1. Commemorative atmospheres: memorial sites, collective events and the experience of national identity
2. Malinowski, David (2019). Afterword. In Amiena Peck, Christopher Stroud & Quentin Williams (eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes, 223–29. London: Bloomsbury.
3. Weisflog, Christian (2014). Krim-Referendum stark gefälscht. Online: https://www.nzz.ch/krim-referendum-stark-gefaelscht-1.18296089 ; accessed 3 December 2018.
4. Making scents of the landscape
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献