In Defense of Broad Consent-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

In Defense of Broad Consent

Published:2011-12-13 Issue:1 Volume:21 Page:40-50
ISSN:0963-1801
Container-title:Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Camb Q Healthc Ethics

Author:

HELGESSON GERT

Abstract

Proper procedures for informed consent are widely recognized as an ethical requirement for biomedical research involving human beings, in particular as a means to respect the autonomy and personal integrity of potential and actual research participants.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference24 articles.

1. Havasupai tribe win nice settlement from ASU in scandalous blood-sample case;Rubin;Phoenix New Times,2010

2. A population-based seroepidemiological study of cervical cancer;Dillner;Cancer Research,1994

3. Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research

4. “Broad” consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose

Cited by 71 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. No recognised ethical standards, no broad consent: navigating the quandary in computational social science research;Research Ethics;2024-04-19

2. Practices;The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology;2024

3. Ethical issues in the use of leftover samples and associated personal data obtained from diagnostic laboratories;Clinica Chimica Acta;2023-08

4. Stakeholder views on informed consent models for future use of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa;BMC Medical Ethics;2023-01-19

5. Biobanks for Biomedical Research: Evolution and Future;Collaborative Bioethics;2023