Author:
Lehmkühler K.,Wong K.C.,Verstraete D.
Abstract
ABSTRACTTwo methods have been compared for the determination of the inertial properties of a small, fixed-wing un-manned aerial vehicle. The first method uses the standard single degree of freedom pendulum method and the second method implements a novel, potentially easier, 3 degrees of freedom pendulum method, which yields the entire inertia tensor from a single swing test. Both methods are using system identification of the pendulum motion to estimate the inertial properties. Substantial corrections (up to 25%) have to be applied to the experimental results. These corrections are caused by the acceleration of the pendulum being immersed in the surrounding air, also called the added mass effect. It has been found that the methods presented in literature to determine the corrections for full-scale aircraft do not give the correct results for the small-scale un-manned aerial vehicle under consideration. The only feasible, cost-effective method to generate these corrections utilise swing tests with a geometrically similar object of known inertial properties. It has also been found that the corrections are unique with respect to the experimental methods. Several benchmarking methods, including the innovative use of static and dynamic wind-tunnel test data, give high confidence in the results.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference31 articles.
1. Bottasso C.L. , Leonello D. , Maffezzoli A. and Riccardi F. A procedure for the identification of the inertial properties of small-size uavs, XX AIDAA Congress Milano, 2009.
2. Method and equipment for inertia parameter identification
3. Patankar S.S. , Schinstock D.E. and Caplinger R.M. Application of pendulum method to uav momental ellipsoid estimation, 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), 2006, Wichita, Kansas, US.
4. Siegmann H. Aerodesign. accessed: 15.3.2012. URL www.aerodesign.de.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献