Author:
Le Blanc Julia,Scholl Almuth
Abstract
We employ a life-cycle model with income risk to analyze how tax-deferred individual accounts affect households' savings for retirement. We consider voluntary accounts as opposed to mandatory accounts with minimum contribution rates. We contrast add-on accounts with carve-out accounts that partly replace social security contributions. Quantitative results suggest that making add-on accounts mandatory has adverse welfare effects across income groups. Carve-out accounts generate positive welfare effects across all income groups, but gains are lower for low income earners. Default investment rules in individual accounts have a modest impact on welfare.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference50 articles.
1. Portfolio Choice and Trading in a Large 401(k) Plan
2. What Explains Changes in Retirement Plans during the Great Recession?
3. Household Portfolios
4. Bodie Zvi , Dennis McLeavey , and Laurence B. Siegel (2007) The Future of Life-Cycle Saving and Investing. The Research Foundation of CFA.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献