Abstract
AbstractThis paper explores the relationship between the concept of the ‘identity of the child’ and legal parenthood. It examines the role of identity in the determination of legal parenthood in three contexts: (a) parental orders after surrogacy arrangements; (b) disputed paternity cases; and (c) the statutory rules in cases involving gamete donation. This paper argues that the concept of ‘identity’ plays an inconsistent role in the attribution of legal parenthood, because the concept lacks substantive content within judicial reasoning and the statutory framework. The understanding of identity, and the role it plays, appears to change in these different contexts to serve the different purposes that the law is trying to achieve. The reason for this inconsistency is that, despite the utilisation of the language of the ‘child's identity’, legal parenthood remains adult-centric and premised upon replicating the binary, two-parent model of the nuclear family. We argue that instead of appealing to this incoherent concept of ‘identity’, the courts should explicitly engage with different types of parenthood and acknowledge the importance of each for both children and parents. Such an approach would result in more truly child-centred reasoning and serve to diminish the predominance of the binary, two-parent model.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference19 articles.
1. Children's right to know their origins – too far, too fast?;Fortin;Child and Family Law Quarterly,2009
2. The regulation and recognition of surrogacy under English law: an overview of the case-law;Fenton-Glynn;Child and Family Law Quarterly,2015
3. Reconceptualising the Interest in Knowing One’s Origins: A Case for Mandatory Disclosure
4. The Limits of Functional Family: Lesbian Mother Litigation in the Era of the Eternal Biological Family
5. Fraying at the edges: UK surrogacy law in 2015;Horsey;Medical Law Review,2016
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献