Abstract
AbstractHerbrand’s theorem is one of the most fundamental insights in logic. From the syntactic point of view, it suggests a compact representation of proofs in classical first- and higher-order logics by recording the information of which instances have been chosen for which quantifiers. This compact representation is known in the literature as Miller’s expansion tree proof. It is inherently analytic and hence corresponds to a cut-free sequent calculus proof. Recently several extensions of such proof representations to proofs with cuts have been proposed. These extensions are based on graphical formalisms similar to proof nets and are limited to prenex formulas.In this paper, we present a new syntactic approach that directly extends Miller’s expansion trees by cuts and also covers non-prenex formulas. We describe a cut-elimination procedure for our expansion trees with cut that is based on the natural reduction steps and shows that it is weakly normalizing.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Reference26 articles.
1. Strong normalization of cut-elimination in classical logic;Urban;Fundamenta Informaticae,2000
2. Urban, C. (2000). Classical Logic and Computation. Phd thesis, University of Cambridge.
3. Exploring the Computational Content of the Infinite Pigeonhole Principle
4. The Epsilon Calculus and Herbrand Complexity
5. Proof Nets for Herbrand’s Theorem
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献