Author:
Zittrain Jonathan,Albert Kendra,Lessig Lawrence
Abstract
AbstractIt has become increasingly common for a reader to follow a URL cited in a court opinion or a law review article, only to be met with an error message because the resource has been moved from its original online address. This form of reference rot, commonly referred to as ‘linkrot’, has arisen from the disconnect between the transience of online materials and the permanence of legal citation, and will only become more prevalent as scholarly materials move online. The present paper*, written by Jonathan Zittrain, Kendra Albert and Lawrence Lessig, explores the pervasiveness of linkrot in academic and legal citations, finding that more than 70% of the URLs within the Harvard Law Review and other journals, and 50% of the URLs within United States Supreme Court opinions, do not link to the originally cited information. In light of these results, a solution is proposed for authors and editors of new scholarship that involves libraries undertaking the distributed, long-term preservation of link contents.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference6 articles.
1. Breaking Down Link Rot: The Chesapeake Project Legal Information Archive's Examination of URL Stability;Rhodes;Law Libr. J.,2010
2. A Longitudinal Study of Web Pages Continued: A Consideration of Document Persistence;Koehler;Information Research,2004
3. Keeping Validity in Cite: Web Resources Cited in Select Washington Law Reviews, 2001–03;Davis;law libr. j.,2006
4. “Link rot” limits the usefulness of web-based educational materials in biochemistry and molecular biology
5. Runaway Train: Problems of Permanence, Accessibility, and Stability in the Use of Web Sources in Law Review Citations;Rumsey;Law Libr. J.,2002
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献