Healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences of obesity and overweight and its management in primary care settings: a qualitative systematic review

Author:

Jeffers LauraORCID,Manner JillianORCID,Jepson RuthORCID,McAteer JohnORCID

Abstract

Abstract Aim: This qualitative systematic review aimed to synthesise existing qualitative research on HCPs’ perceptions and experiences of obesity and its management in primary care settings. Background: Healthcare professionals (HCPs), particularly those in primary care, play a key role in policy implementation around weight management. Overweight and obese individuals are subject to weight stigma which has negative health consequences and reduces the likelihood of healthcare service usage. An understanding of HCPs’ perceptions of obesity and weight management in primary care is necessary for the development and delivery of effective initiatives. Methods: A search strategy developed using the SPIDER framework was applied to Medline and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were applied, and quality assessment was undertaken using the CASP framework. Fifteen papers meeting the inclusion criteria were analysed thematically. Findings: Four themes were identified: conflicting discourses surrounding obesity, medicalisation of obesity, organisational factors, and lack of patient knowledge and motivation. Conflicting discourses around obesity refers to the differing views of HCPs regarding what it means to have and treat obesity. Medicalisation of obesity considers whether obesity should be treated as a medical condition. Organisational factors were identified as knowledge, resources and time that affected HCPs’ ability to provide care to overweight or obese. Finally, the review discovered that patients required their own knowledge and motivation to lose weight. This review has highlighted the need to provide safe, non-judgemental spaces for HCPs and patients to discuss weight and weight loss. This is essential to the therapeutic relationship and the provision of effective obesity management.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Reference43 articles.

1. Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalisation scale;Durso;Obesity (Silver Spring),2008

2. Ogden, J (2014) Weight bias and stigma- Expert testimonial for PDG. WMA Expert Paper 1. NICE. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph53/evidence/expert-paper-1-jane-ogden-pdf-431710525 (accessed 21 September 2020)

3. What’s therapeutic about the therapeutic relationship? A hypothesis for practice informed by Perceptual Control Theory;Carey;The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist,2012

4. Waist circumference measurement: knowledge, attitudes and barriers in patients and practitioners in a multi-ethnic population;Dunkley;Family Practice,2009

5. Primary health care providers’ roles and responsibilities: A qualitative exploration of ‘who does what’ in the treatment and management of persons affected by obesity;Hayes;Journal of Communication in Healthcare,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3