Access to episodic primary care: a cross-sectional comparison of walk-in clinics and urgent primary care centers in British Columbia

Author:

McCracken Mary A.,Cooper Ian R.,Hamilton Michee-AnaORCID,Klimas JanORCID,Lindsay Cameron,Fletcher SarahORCID,Price MorganORCID,Hedden LindsayORCID,McCracken Rita K.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Aim: This study aimed to identify publicly reported access characteristics for episodic primary care in BC and provided a clinic-level comparison between walk-in clinics and UPCCs. Background: Walk-in clinics are non-hospital-based primary care facilities that are designed to operate without appointments and provide increased healthcare access with extended hours. Urgent and Primary Care Centres (UPCCs) were introduced to British Columbia (BC) in 2018 as an additional primary care resource that provided urgent, but not emergent care during extended hours. Methods: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from all walk-in clinics and UPCCs in BC. A structured data collection form was used to record access characteristics from clinic websites, including business hours, weekend availability, attachment to a longitudinal family practice, and provision of virtual services. Findings: In total, 268 clinics were included in the analysis (243 walk-in clinics, 25 UPCCs). Of those, 225 walk-in clinics (92.6%) and two UPCCs (8.0%) were attached to a longitudinal family practice. Only 153 (63%) walk-in clinics offered weekend services, compared to 24 (96%) of UPCCs. Walk-in clinics offered the majority (8,968.6/ 78.4%) of their service hours between 08:00 and 17:00, Monday to Friday. UPCCs offered the majority (889.3/ 53.7%) of their service hours after 17:00. Conclusion: Most walk-in clinics were associated with a longitudinal family practice and provided the majority of clinic services during typical business hours. More research that includes patient characteristics and care outcomes, analyzed at the clinic level, may be useful to support the optimization of episodic primary healthcare delivery.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Care Planning,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference47 articles.

1. Government of Canada, I. A. P. on R. E (2019) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans – TCPS 2 (2018) – Chapter 2: Scope and Approach. Retrieved 1 April 2019 from https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/tcps2-eptc2_2018_chapter2-chapitre2.html

2. Systematic review of recent innovations in service provision to improve access to primary care;Chapman;The British Journal of General Practice : The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners,2004

3. Xu, X (2022) Nearly 900,000 British Columbians don’t have a Family Doctor, Leaving Walk-In Clinics and ERs Swamped. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 29 April 2022 from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/british-columbia/article-nearly-900000-british-columbians-dont-have-a-family-doctor-leaving/

4. BC Ministry of Health and Deputy Ministry of Health (2019) Supportive Policy Directive—Urgent and Primary Care Centres, version 5 (Government October 2019; Ministry of Health Policy Instrument, p. 11). Ministry of Health. Retrieved 13 July 2023  from https://divisionsbc.ca/sites/default/files/inline-files/PCN_UPCC_Revised_Policy_October2019_V5.pdf

5. Kiran, T and Pham, T-N (2023) More than 6.5 million Adults in Canada Lack Access to Primary Care. Healthy Debate. Retrieved 15 March 2023 from https://healthydebate.ca/2023/03/topic/millions-adults-lack-canada-primary-care/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3