Priority setting and cross-country learning: the relevance of TO-REACH for primary care

Author:

Groenewegen PeterORCID,Hansen JohanORCID,Fahy Nick,Haarmann Alexander,Montante Sabrina,Azzopardi Muscat Natasha,Poldrugovac MirchaORCID,Ricciardi Walter,Tomaselli Gianpaolo

Abstract

Abstract Aim: To inform the primary care community about priorities for research in primary care as came up from the European project TO-REACH and to discuss transferability of service and policy innovations between countries. Background: TO-REACH stands for Transfer of Organizational innovations for Resilient, Effective, equitable, Accessible, sustainable and Comprehensive Health services and systems. This EU-funded project has put health systems and services research higher on the European agenda and has led to the current development of a European ‘Partnership Transforming Health and Care Systems’. Methods: To identify research priorities, both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. Policy documents and strategic roadmaps were searched, and priorities were mapped. Stakeholders were involved through national roundtable consultations and online consultations. Regarding transferability, we carried out a review of the literature, guided by a conceptual framework, and using a snowballing approach. Findings: Primary care emerged as an important priority from the inventory, as are areas that are conducive to strengthening primary care, such as workforce policies. The large variation in service organisation and policy around primary care in Europe is a huge potential for cross-country learning. However, the simple transfer of primary care service and policy arrangements from one health system to another has a big chance to fail, unless known conditions for successful transfer are taken into account and gaps in our knowledge about transfer are resolved.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Care Planning,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference30 articles.

1. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

2. Nutley, S , Davies, H and Walter, I (2002) Briefing note 1: what is a conceptual synthesis? Briefing notes. St Andrews: Research Unit for Research Utilisation, Department of Management, University of St Andrews.

3. WHO (2016) The European framework for action on integrated health services delivery. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.

4. WHO (2012) The European Programme of Work, 2020–2025: united action for better health. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3