Author:
Agarwal Sumit,Amromin Gene,Ben-David Itzhak,Chomsisengphet Souphala,Zhang Yan
Abstract
When borrowers are delinquent, senior debtholders prefer liquidation, whereas junior debtholders prefer to maintain their option value by delaying resolution or modifying the loan. In the mortgage market, a conflict of interest (“holdup”) arises when servicers of securitized senior liens are also the owners of the junior liens on the same property. We show that holdup servicers are able to delay action on the first-lien mortgage. When they do act, servicers are more likely to choose resolutions that maintain their option value, favoring modification and soft foreclosures over outright foreclosures. Holdup behavior is more likely to result in borrower self-curing.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference38 articles.
1. Does loan renegotiation differ by securitization status? A transition probability study
2. Securitization and distressed loan renegotiation: Evidence from the subprime mortgage crisis
3. Federal Mortgage Modification and Foreclosure Prevention Efforts;Pinedo;Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal,2009
4. Barriers to Foreclosure Prevention during the Financial Crisis;McCoy;Arizona Law Review,2012
5. The Rise in Mortgage Defaults
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献