Abstract
AbstractIn a rich, calibrated life-cycle model, we show that well-designed mandatory pension plans significantly improve the welfare of individuals procrastinating on savings, and even improve most rational individuals’ welfare through a return tax advantage and fair annuitization. For a group of heterogeneous savers, in terms of preferences and sophistication, the best plan has contributions of 10% of income from age 30, a glidepath investment strategy, payouts following a variable lifelong annuity, and options to choose a different investment strategy and to modify the annuitization feature. This plan generates an average welfare gain of $175,000 per individual.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference58 articles.
1. Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior;Benartzi;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2007
2. Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting
3. Gomes, F. ; Hoyem, K. ; Hu, W.-Y. ; and Ravina, E. . “Retirement Savings Adequacy in U.S. Defined Contribution Plans.” Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3294422 (2020).
4. Labor Supply Flexibility and Portfolio Choice in a Life Cycle Model;Bodie;Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1992
5. Investing Retirement Wealth
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献