Abstract
AbstractPrior research finds that Dodd–Frank Act’s regulations on credit rating agencies (CRAs) increase rated firms’ risk of rating downgrades, regardless of their credit quality. Our difference-in-difference estimates suggest that after Dodd–Frank, low-rated firms, which face steep costs from a further downgrade, significantly reduce their debt issuance and investments compared to similar unrated firms. Our results are not driven by credit supply or the financial crisis. They reveal an unintended consequence of Dodd–Frank: Greater regulatory pressure on CRAs leads to negative spillover effects on firms concerned about credit ratings, regardless of their credit quality.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference43 articles.
1. Does Section 16b deter insider trading by target managers?
2. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders
3. Feedback effects of credit ratings
4. Passive investors, not passive owners
5. Grennan, J. ; Michaely, R. ; and Vincent, C. J. . “The Deleveraging of U.S. Firms and Institutional Investors’ Role.” Working Paper, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1941902 (2017).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献