Abstract
Abstract
We study how banks use “regulatory adjustments” to inflate their regulatory capital ratios and whether this depends on forbearance on the part of national authorities. Using the 2011 EBA capital exercise as a quasi-natural experiment, we find that banks substantially inflated their levels of regulatory capital via a reduction in regulatory adjustments (without a commensurate increase in book equity and without a reduction in bank risk). We document substantial heterogeneity in regulatory capital inflation across countries, suggesting that national authorities forbear their domestic banks to meet supranational requirements, with a focus on short-term economic considerations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference71 articles.
1. Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
2. Haldane, A. G. “Constraining Discretion in Bank Regulation.” Speech Given at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Conference on “Maintaining Financial Stability: Holding a Tiger by the Tail(s).” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Atlanta, 9 April 2013 (2013).
3. Do Capital Requirements Make Banks Safer? Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment
4. How Sensitive are Bank Market Values to Regulatory Adjustments of Capital?
5. Rules Versus Discretion in Bank Resolution;Walther;Review of Financial Studies,2020
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献