Author:
Jordan David L.,Frans Robert E.,McClelland Marilyn R.
Abstract
Experiments were conducted to compare control of entireleaf morningglory with POST applications of DPX-PE350 applied with no adjuvant, a nonionic surfactant, or crop oil concentrate in spray volumes of 94, 235, and 375 L ha−1. Control was greater with a nonionic surfactant or crop oil concentrate than with no adjuvant and control with crop oil concentrate exceeded control with the nonionic surfactant. Spray volume had no effect on efficacy. DPX-PE350 was more effective when applied to foliage only or to soil plus foliage than when applied to soil only after emergence of entireleaf morningglory. Control from soil-only applications was lower on a silty clay soil than on a silt loam soil. Except for sicklepod, mixing DPX-PE350 with fluometuron or MSMA had little effect on weed control.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Susceptibility of eight morningglory species to DPX-PE350;Holshouser;Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc.,1991
2. Evaluation of KIH-8921 for weed management systems in cotton;Jordan;Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc.,1990
3. The Impact of Adjuvants on Herbicide Antagonism
4. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) control with bentazon plus adjuvants;Nalewaja;Weed Sci.,1977
5. Effects of droplet size, spray volume, and dosage on paraquat toxicity;McKinley;Weed Sci.,1974
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献