Author:
Borise Lena,Erschler David
Abstract
AbstractThis paper provides new evidence in support of the hypothesis that the syntax–prosody mapping of Intonational Phrases is flexible (Hamlaoui and Szendrői 2015). In the traditional ‘rigid’ approaches, Intonational Phrases are taken to map onto particular syntactic projections. In contrast, in the ‘flexible’ approach, the Intonational Phrase corresponds to the highest projection of the verb (HVP). Accordingly, the ‘flexible’ approach predicts that the HVP should also determine the size of Intonational Phrases in a language where the verb height depends on the utterance type. Our evidence comes from a language of this type, Iron Ossetic (East Iranian). First, we demonstrate that verbs in Iron Ossetic occupy different functional heads in different contexts. Then, based on novel prosodic data, we show that the HVP indeed directly determines the size of Intonational Phrases in clauses with narrow foci and negative indefinites. Additionally, in wh-questions, language-specific mapping constraints come into play.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference105 articles.
1. The prosody and syntax of Zulu relative clauses;Cheng;SOAS Papers in Linguistics,2007
2. Bródy, Michael (1995). Focus and checking theory. In István Kenesei (ed.) Approaches to Hungarian, volume 5. Szeged: Jate, 29–44.
3. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases;Truckenbrodt;LI,1999
4. From preverbal focus to preverbal “left periphery”: The Ossetic clause architecture in areal and diachronic perspective
5. Emonds, Joseph E. (1970). Root and structure-preserving transformations. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献