Abstract
AbstractMost of the Catalan vineyards were cultivated by means of sharecropping contracts that granted the sharecropper ownership rights over the land. This paper maintains that the “bundle of rights” view of property is not the most appropriate for analysing situations of this kind. It shows that, from around 1900 onwards, sharecroppers’ rights became insecure, which gave rise to a series of dysfunctions that resulted in the contract no longer being optimal. It concludes that the removal of the inefficiencies arising from shared ownership was a sufficient reason to justify the agrarian reform that the Catalan Parliament sought to introduce in 1934.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,History
Reference64 articles.
1. Too many workers or not enough land? Why land reform fails in Spain during the 1930s;Simpson;Historia Agraria,2017
2. La Rabassa morta y la costumbre para su interpretación;Hostench;Revista General de Legislación y Jurisprudencia,1924
3. Comentario a la sentencia de 31 de enero de 1969. Rabassa Morta;Puig;Revista Jurídica de Cataluña,1970
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献