Author:
Cann Damon,Goelzhauser Greg
Abstract
Abstract
How does oral argument attendance impact public perceptions of the judiciary? Judicial independence is partly contingent on public support, but the conditions that generate institutional good will are not well understood. We examine how judicial outreach and court exposure inform public attitudes. Leveraging a field-experiment randomizing in-person attendance at oral arguments conducted by a federal circuit court of appeals on a university campus, we find that exposure increases perceptions of institutional legitimacy and the extent to which judicial decisions are motivated by law versus politics. The results have important implications for judicial politics and policy debates concerning reform initiatives involving circuit riding, courtroom cameras, and public outreach.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Political Science and International Relations
Reference60 articles.
1. Reintroducing circuit riding: A timely proposal;Calabresi;Minnesota Law Review,2006
2. Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority
3. The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy
4. Getting to know us: Judicial outreach in Oregon;Deits;The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process,2004
5. U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy