The regulation of host population growth by parasitic species

Abstract

SummaryThe nature of parasitism at the population level is defined in terms of the parasite's influence on the natural intrinsic growth rate of its host population. It is suggested that the influence on this rate is related to the average parasite burden/host and hence to the statistical distribution of parasites within the host population.Theoretical models of host–parasite associations are used to assess the regulatory influence of parasitic species on host population growth. Model predictions suggest that three specific groups of population processes are of particular importance: over-dispersion of parasite numbers/host, density dependence in parasite mortality or reproduction and parasite-induced host mortality that increases faster than linearly with the parasite burden. Other population mechanisms are shown to have a destabilizing influence, namely: parasite-induced reduction in host reproductive potential, direct parasite reproduction within the host and time delays in the development of transmission stages of the parasite.These regulatory and destabilizing processes are shown to be commonly observed features of natural host-parasite associations. It is argued that interactions in the real world are characterized by a degree of tension between these regulatory and destabilizing forces and that population rate parameter values in parasite life-cycles are very far from being a haphazard selection of all numerically possible values. It is suggested that evolutionary pressures in observed associations will tend to counteract a strong destabilizing force by an equally strong regulatory influence. Empirical evidence is shown to support this suggestion in, for example, associations between larval digeneans and molluscan hosts (parasite-induced reduction in host reproductive potential counteracted by tight density-dependent constraints on parasite population growth), and interactions between protozoan parasites and mammalian hosts (direct parasite reproduction counteracted by a well-developed immunological response by the host).The type of laboratory and field data required to improve our understanding of the dynamical properties of host–parasite population associations is discussed and it is suggested that quantitative measurement of rates of parasite-induced host mortality, degrees of over-dispersion, transmission rates and reproductive and mortality rates of both host and parasite would provide an important first step. The value of laboratory work in this area is demonstrated by reference to studies which highlight the regulatory influence of parasitic species on host population growth.