Abstract
This work reviews recent research on the design and control of
interfaces in engineering nanomaterials. Four case studies are
presented that demonstrate the power of a multimodal approach to the
characterization of different types of interfaces. We have used a
combination of conventional, high resolution, and analytical
transmission electron microscopy, microbeam electron diffraction, and
three-dimensional atom probe to study polymer–clay
nanocomposites, turbine rotor steels used for power generation,
multicomponent aluminum alloys, and nanocrystalline magnetic
materials.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference41 articles.
1. Giannelis, E.P. (1996).Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites.Adv Mater 8,29–35.
2. Ho, O.B. (1996).The determination of Davies HLB increments for cationic surfactants fromzeta potential measurements on emulsions. InProceedings of the 4th World Surfactant Congress,Section D, pp.451–461.Barcelona:CED.
3. Ringer, S.P. , Hono, K. , Polmear, I.J. , & Sakurai, T. (1996).Nucleation of precipitates in aged Al-Cu-Mg-(Ag) alloys with highCu:Mg ratios.Acta Metall Mater 44,1883–1898.
4. Lan, T. & Pinnavaia, T.J. (1994).Clay-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites.Chem Mater 6,2216–2219.
5. Mitera, M. , Naka, M. , Masumoto, T. , Kazama, N. , & Watanabe, K. (1978).Effects of metalloids on the magnetic properties of iron-basedamorphous alloys.Phys Status Solidi A 49,K163–K166.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献