Author:
Berg Marc,van der Grinten Tom,Klazinga Niek
Abstract
This article provides a critical analysis of the impact of health technology assessment (HTA) on priority setting in The Netherlands. It describes the limited steering powers of the Dutch government; its complex interactions with insurers, health-care providers, and patients; and the role of HTA in this context as an attempt to rationalize the debate about cost-effectiveness issues. HTA has been drawn upon for decision making on the health insurance package. Also, HTA findings have been linked to the national guideline development programs of the medical community. However, these impacts by no means have been straightforward. We argue that the political nature of the priority-setting debate asks for a broader approach to what constitutes HTA, and how it should be drawn upon in priority setting. Suggestions are made on how to do justice to the social dynamics of decision making and the behavior of stakeholders in health-care systems.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference35 articles.
1. Berg M , ter Meulen RHJ , van den Burg M .2001 Guidelines for appropriate care: The importance of empirical normative analysis.Health Care Analysis.9:77–99.
2. Weggeman M .1997 Kennismanagement: Inrichting en besturing van kennisintensieve organisaties.Schiedam:Scriptum;
3. Ashmore M , Mulkay M , Pinch T .1989 Health and efficiency: A sociology of health economics.Milton Keynes:Open University Press;
4. Health Council of The Netherlands.1991 Medisch handelen op een tweesprong (Medical treatment at the crossroads) [in Dutch].The Hague:Health Council of The Netherlands;
5. Mulder JH .1997 Terug naar de zorg. Dunning gekanteld.Medisch Contact.39:1219–1220.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献