Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The objective was to identify and describe the published guidance and current academic discourse of ethical issues and standards related to the use of Social Media Research for generating patient insights for the use by health technology assessment (HTA) or health policy decisions.
Methods
A scoping review of the literature was conducted in PubMed and Embase and identified 935 potential references published between January 2017 and June 2021. After title and abstract screening by three reviewers, 40 publications were included, the relevant information was extracted and data were collected in a mind map, which was then used to structure the output of the review.
Results
Social Media Research may reveal new insights of relevance to HTA or health policies into patient needs, patient experiences, or patient behaviors. However, the research approaches, methods, data use, interpretation, and communication may expose those who post the data in social media channels to risks and potential harms relating to privacy, anonymity/confidentiality, authenticity, context, and rapidly changing technologies.
Conclusions
An actively engaged approach to ensuring ethical innocuousness is recommended that carefully follows best practices throughout planning, conduct, and communication of the research. Throughout the process and as a follow-up, there should be a discourse with the ethical experts to maximally protect the current and future users of social media, to support their trust in the research, and to advance the knowledge in parallel to the advancement of the media themselves, the technologies, and the research tools.
Funder
Health Technology Assessment international
Novartis
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference25 articles.
1. The Issue of “Context”: Data, Culture, and Commercial Context in Social Media Ethics
2. What Is “Publicly Available Data”? Exploring Blurred Public–Private Boundaries and Ethical Practices Through a Case Study on Instagram
3. Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards
4. 3. Franzke, AS , Bechmann, A , Zimmer, M , Ess, CM , AoIR Ethics Working Group 3.0. Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0 - Association of Internet Researchers. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR); 2020.