Ethical and legal considerations in social media research for health technology assessment: conclusions from a scoping review

Author:

Holtorf Anke-PeggyORCID,Danyliv AndriyORCID,Krause Annekatrin,Hanna AlissaORCID,Venable Yvette,Mattingly T. JosephORCID,Huang Li-YingORCID,Pierre Miranda,Silveira Silva AlineORCID,Walsh Donna

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The objective was to identify and describe the published guidance and current academic discourse of ethical issues and standards related to the use of Social Media Research for generating patient insights for the use by health technology assessment (HTA) or health policy decisions. Methods A scoping review of the literature was conducted in PubMed and Embase and identified 935 potential references published between January 2017 and June 2021. After title and abstract screening by three reviewers, 40 publications were included, the relevant information was extracted and data were collected in a mind map, which was then used to structure the output of the review. Results Social Media Research may reveal new insights of relevance to HTA or health policies into patient needs, patient experiences, or patient behaviors. However, the research approaches, methods, data use, interpretation, and communication may expose those who post the data in social media channels to risks and potential harms relating to privacy, anonymity/confidentiality, authenticity, context, and rapidly changing technologies. Conclusions An actively engaged approach to ensuring ethical innocuousness is recommended that carefully follows best practices throughout planning, conduct, and communication of the research. Throughout the process and as a follow-up, there should be a discourse with the ethical experts to maximally protect the current and future users of social media, to support their trust in the research, and to advance the knowledge in parallel to the advancement of the media themselves, the technologies, and the research tools.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment international

Novartis

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference25 articles.

1. The Issue of “Context”: Data, Culture, and Commercial Context in Social Media Ethics

2. What Is “Publicly Available Data”? Exploring Blurred Public–Private Boundaries and Ethical Practices Through a Case Study on Instagram

3. Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards

4. 3. Franzke, AS , Bechmann, A , Zimmer, M , Ess, CM , AoIR Ethics Working Group 3.0. Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0 - Association of Internet Researchers. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR); 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3