Health Technology Assessment in Support of National Health Insurance in South Africa

Author:

Wilkinson MarykeORCID,Gray Andrew Lofts,Wiseman Roger,Kredo Tamara,Cohen Karen,Miot Jacqui,Blecher Mark,Ruff Paul,Johnson Yasmina,Poluta Mladen,McGee Shelley,Leong Trudy D,Brand Mark,Suleman Fatima,Maramba Esnath,Blockman Marc,Jugathpal Janine,Cleary Susan,Nematswerani Noluthando,Moodliar Sarvashni,Parrish Andy,Jamaloodien Khadija K,Stander Tienie,MacQuilkan Kim,Crisp Nicholas,Wilkinson Thomas

Abstract

Abstract South Africa has embarked on major health policy reform to deliver universal health coverage through the establishment of National Health Insurance (NHI). The aim is to improve access, remove financial barriers to care, and enhance care quality. Health technology assessment (HTA) is explicitly identified in the proposed NHI legislation and will have a prominent role in informing decisions about adoption and access to health interventions and technologies. The specific arrangements and approach to HTA in support of this legislation are yet to be determined. Although there is currently no formal national HTA institution in South Africa, there are several processes in both the public and private healthcare sectors that use elements of HTA to varying extents to inform access and resource allocation decisions. Institutions performing HTAs or related activities in South Africa include the National and Provincial Departments of Health, National Treasury, National Health Laboratory Service, Council for Medical Schemes, medical scheme administrators, managed care organizations, academic or research institutions, clinical societies and associations, pharmaceutical and devices companies, private consultancies, and private sector hospital groups. Existing fragmented HTA processes should coordinate and conform to a standardized, fit-for-purpose process and structure that can usefully inform priority setting under NHI and for other decision makers. This transformation will require comprehensive and inclusive planning with dedicated funding and regulation, and provision of strong oversight mechanisms and leadership.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference22 articles.

1. Essential medicine selection during the COVID-19 pandemic: Enabling access in uncharted territory

2. 18. Council for Medical Schemes (2012) Methodology to assess the cost impact of PMB benefit definitions. Pretoria.

3. South African clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis

4. 15. National Department of Health Republic of South Africa (2012) Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic submissions. South Africa.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3