Regulatory, health technology assessment and company interactions: the current landscape and future ecosystem for drug development, review and reimbursement

Author:

Wang TingORCID,McAuslane Neil,Goettsch Wim G.ORCID,Leufkens Hubert G.M.,De Bruin Marie L.

Abstract

Abstract Background Multi-stakeholder interactions have evolved at product and policy levels. There is a need to assess the current and future landscape of interactions between companies, and regulatory and HTA agencies to address challenges and identify areas for improvement. Objectives The aims of this study were to review the current interactions within and across regulatory and HTA agencies, and companies’ experiences in engaging in these activities; to assess the added value of interactions as well as limitations; to explore the future ecosystem for stakeholder interactions. Method Three separate questionnaires were developed for companies, regulators and HTA agencies, respectively, to assess their experiences and perceptions. The responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and discussed at a multi-stakeholder workshop. Key outcomes from the surveys and workshop discussion were reported. Results All seven regulators and seven HTA agencies in the survey indicated that they had stakeholder interactions. More formal collaboration occurred with regulators compared with HTA agencies. All nine companies have taken early advice but indicated the need for future prioritization. Success indicators can be built at the product and therapy levels, with the added value of faster patient access. Four principles were proposed for the future ecosystem: separate remit and functions between regulators and HTA; align processes; converge evidence requirements where possible; increase transparency. Conclusions This research brought together regulators, HTA agencies, companies to examine how they interact with one another. We propose measures of value and make recommendations on future evolution to enable better evidence generation and improve regulatory and HTA decision-making.

Funder

Universiteit Utrecht

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference36 articles.

1. Implementation of a framework for an abridged review using good reliance practices: Optimising the medicine regulatory review process in South Africa;Keyter;Ther Innov Regul Sci.,2020

2. Developing a quality management system for the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA): toward European HTA collaboration

3. 32. Zorginstituut Nederland (ZIN). Parallel procedure: Faster drug evaluation. [Internet] [cited 2022 July 29th]. Available from: https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/over-ons/werkwijzen-en-procedures/adviseren-over-en-verduidelijken-van-het-basispakket-aan-zorg/beoordeling-van-geneesmiddelen/parallelle-procedure.

4. 8. Australian Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Australia-Canada-Singapore-Switzerland-United Kingdom (Access) Consortium. [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022 July 29th]. Available from: https://www.tga.gov.au/australia-canada-singapore-switzerland-united-kingdom-access-consortium.

5. 24. Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS). Regulatory, HTA and payer interactions and collaborations: Optimising their use and outcome success. 10-11th March 2021 [Workshop Report]. 2021 August 26th 2021. Report No.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3