Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy:A Review of Current Issues-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy:A Review of Current Issues

Published:1997 Issue:2 Volume:13 Page:368-379
ISSN:0266-4623
Container-title:International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
language:en
Short-container-title:Int J Technol Assess Health Care

Author:

Young Wendy,Cohen Marsha M.

Abstract

AbstractA review of 39 articles found no consensus on indication for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) compared with traditional approaches. Since only three randomized trials comparing LAVH with traditional methods exist, the scientific basis for surgical choice is lacking. Uncontrolled studies indicated that outcomes following LAVH were not superior to vaginal hysterectomy and costs were significantly higher.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference77 articles.

1. The National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths

2. Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting;Summitt;Obstetrics and Gynecology,1992

3. 73. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Policy statement on hysterectomy, #47. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, 1996, 04, 1–20.

4. A hospital review of advanced gynecologic endoscopic procedures

5. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal;Schwartz;Journal of Reproductive Medicine,1994

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy: perioperative morbidity;Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics;2010-09-16

2. Clinical assessment for three routes of hysterectomy;Chinese Medical Journal;2009-02

3. Laparoscopic hysterectomy;The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists;2000-02