Author:
Støme Linn Nathalie,Moger Tron,Kidholm Kristian,Kværner Kari J.
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesEarly assessment can assist in allocating resources for innovation effectively and produce the most beneficial technology for an institution. The aim of the present study was to identify methods and discuss the analytical approaches applied for the early assessment of innovation in a healthcare setting.MethodsKnowledge synthesis based on a structured search (using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases) and thematic analysis was conducted. An analytical framework based on the stage of innovation (developmental, introduction, or early diffusion) was applied to assess whether methods vary according to stage. Themes (type of innovation, study, analysis, study design, method, and main target audience) were then decided among the authors. Identified methods and analysis were discussed according to the innovation stage.ResultsA total of 1,064 articles matched the search strategy. Overall, thirty-nine articles matched the inclusion criteria. The use of methods has a tendency to change according to the stage of innovation. Stakeholder analysis was a prominent method in the innovation stages and particularly in the developmental stage, as the introduction and early diffusion stage has more availability of data and may apply more complex methods. Barriers to the identified methods were also discussed as all of the innovation stages suffered from lack of data and substantial uncertainty.ConclusionsAlthough this review has identified applicable approaches for early assessment in different innovation stages, research is required regarding the value of the available data and methods and tools to enhance interactions between different parties at different stages of innovation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference51 articles.
1. Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocol
2. Early Phase Technology Assessment of Nanotechnology in Oncology
3. Assessment(INAHTA) INoAfHT. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment(INAHTA). http://www.inahta.org/HTA/ (accessed April 16, 2014).
4. PRISMA. 2017. http://www.prisma-statement.org/ (accessed January 3, 2019).
5. Dynamic capabilities and innovation capabilities: The case of the ‘innovation clinic’;Strønen;J Entrep Manag Innov,2017
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献