Abstract
Abstract
Background
Olaparib targets the DNA repair pathways and has revolutionized the management of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Treatment with the drug should be guided by genetic testing; however, published economic evaluations did not consider olaparib and genetic testing as codependent technologies. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of BRCA germline testing to inform olaparib treatment in mCRPC.
Methods
We conducted a cost-utility analysis of germline BRCA testing-guided olaparib treatment compared to standard care without testing from an Australian health payer perspective. The analysis applied a decision tree to indicate the germline testing or no testing strategy. A Markov multi-state transition approach was used for patients within each strategy. The model had a time horizon of 5 years. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 5 percent. Decision uncertainty was characterized using probabilistic and scenario analyses.
Results
Compared to standard care, BRCA testing-guided olaparib treatment was associated with an incremental cost of AU$7,841 and a gain of 0.06 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was AU$143,613 per QALY. The probability of BRCA testing-guided treatment being cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of AU$100,000 per QALY was around 2 percent; however, the likelihood for cost-effectiveness increased to 66 percent if the price of olaparib was reduced by 30 percent.
Conclusion
This is the first study to evaluate germline genetic testing and olaparib treatment as codependent technologies in mCRPC. Genetic testing-guided olaparib treatment may be cost-effective with significant discounts on olaparib pricing.
Funder
Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference67 articles.
1. Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer;Pritchard;N Engl J Med.,2016
2. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer;Castro;J Clin Oncol.,2013
3. 18. NCCN. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology, prostate cancer. Version 4. 2022. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf.
4. 56. NICE. Olaparib for previously treated BRCA mutation-positive hormone-relapsed metastatic prostate cancer [TA887]. 2023. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta887/chapter/3-Committee-discussion.
5. Prognostic significance of third-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Comparative assessments between cabazitaxel and other agents;Miyake;Int J Clin Oncol.,2021