Abstract
This article develops arguments for the use of decision theory, rather than intuition, to determine the size of trials. It is wrong to expect doctors to ignore personal preferences in favor of clinical experiments unless the trial is capable of showing differences in treatment effect that would influence clinical practice substantially.
It follows from our analysis that if delta (the treatment effect that the trial is designed to detect) is sufficient to alter clinical practice, then the alpha and beta errors of a trial should be equal. This applies even if a new treatment is to be compared with conventional therapy or if a treatment with high “costs” is compared with a less invasive or more inexpensive method.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference21 articles.
1. A basic programme to perform power calculations;Williams;Computers in Patient Care Survey,1987
2. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal
3. CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TREATMENT OF RECURRENT SPONTANEOUS ABORTION BY IMMUNISATION WITH PATERNAL CELLS
4. Clinical experimentation in obstetrics
5. MRC/RCOG working party on cervical cerclage;McNaughton;British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,1988
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献