VISIONS OF STAKEHOLDERS ABOUT INSTUTIONALIZATION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN CHILE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Author:

Lavín Constanza Paz,Alaniz Rafael,Espinoza Manuel

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore and describe the viewpoints and beliefs with respect to a health technology assessment (HTA) process and its institutionalization in a sample of stakeholder representatives in Chile.Methods: A qualitative study with a descriptive design, based on the model of discourse analysis, was performed. Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted on nineteen Chilean representatives of stakeholders in HTA. The data analysis was based on a process of open coding that allows the contrasting of the interviewees’ visions.Results: From what the interviewees mentioned, a proposal to institutionalize the process of HTA is presented for Chile. The focus is on three main areas: (i) Principles to guide the HTA, (ii) Institutional Framework for Chile, and (iii) Impacts associated with their implementation process. Transparency and participation were the main principles identified. The idea of an autonomous body for HTA, independent and publicly funded, was widely supported. However, this implementation could face potential resistance from technicians and politicians, who might impose barriers to avoid their loss of decision power.Conclusions: There is a broad agreement about the importance of creating a national institution for HTA, independent and publicly funded. This study supplies relevant information for other countries that are currently undertaking a similar process.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference18 articles.

1. Accountability for reasonableness

2. National Institutional for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE. Social value judgments: Principles for the development of NICE guidelines; 2005. https://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/About/what-we-do/Research-and-development/Social-Value-Judgements-principles-for-the-development-of-NICE-guidance.pdf (accessed May 14, 2015).

3. Ministerio de Salud . Revisión del Proceso de Priorización de las Garantias Explicitas en Salud (GES). [Intrernet]. Santiago: Departamento de Economía de la Salud, MINSAL; 2011. http://desal.minsal.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/REVISION_PRIORIZACION_INFORMEFINAL.pdf (accessed March 3, 2015).

4. Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3