Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework

Author:

Burls Amanda,Caron Lorraine,Cleret de Langavant Ghislaine,Dondorp Wybo,Harstall Christa,Pathak-Sen Ela,Hofmann Bjørn

Abstract

Objectives: Values are intrinsic to the use of health technology assessments (HTAs) in health policy, but neglecting value assumptions in HTA makes their results appear more robust or normatively neutral than may be the case. Results of a 2003 survey by the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) revealed the existence of disparate methods for making values and ethical issues explicit when conducting HTA.Methods: An Ethics Working Group, with representation from sixteen agencies, was established to develop a framework for addressing ethical issues in HTA. Using an iterative approach, with email exchanges and face-to-face workshops, a report on Handling Ethical Issues was produced.Results: This study describes the development process and the agreed upon framework for reflexive ethical analysis that aims to uncover and explore the ethical implications of technologies through an integrated, context-sensitive approach and situates the proposed framework within previous work in the development of ethics analysis in HTA.Conclusions: It is important that methodological approaches to address ethical reflection in HTA be integrative and context sensitive. The question-based approach described and recommended here is meant to elicit this type of reflection in a way that can be used by HTA agencies. The questions proposed are considered only as a starting point for handling ethics issues, but their use would represent a significant improvement over much of the existing practice.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference38 articles.

1. Riluzole for motor neurone disease

2. 20. INAHTA . Handling ethical issues in INAHTA agencies. INAHTA Newsletter, March 2003. www.inahta.org/upload/Newsletters/Newsletter%20Jan-Mar%2003.pdf (accessed February 4, 2011).

3. THE GREAT ESCAPE?

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Health Technology Assessment: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues;International Encyclopedia of Public Health;2025

2. Institutional Priority-Setting for Novel Drugs and Therapeutics: A Qualitative Systematic Review;International Journal of Health Policy and Management;2024-02-10

3. A Quantitative Model for the Assessment of Ethics Risks in Information Technology;2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS);2023-05-18

4. Translating Precision Health for Pediatrics: A Scoping Review;Children;2023-05-17

5. Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Intensive Care in the Hospital: Opportunities and Challenges;Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3