Abstract
AbstractFeeding into current debates on ethnic identities in colonial South Asia, this article questions to what extent Dutch institutions articulated and impacted social categories of people living in coastal Sri Lanka during the eighteenth century. A thorough analysis of three spheres of Dutch bureaucracy (reporting, registering, and litigating) makes it clear that there was no uniform ideology that steered categorisation practices top-down throughout the studied colonial institutions. Rather, the rationale of the organisation as such affected the way people were classified, depending to a large extent on what level of bureaucracy individuals were dealing with, and what the possible negotiation strategies were for the people recorded. Future research should perhaps not ask “when” certain ethnicities were “made up,” but strive to understand the process in which they were created, the institutional contexts in which they were recorded, and how changing bureaucratic practices not only articulated, but also transformed, social categories in the long run.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,History
Reference65 articles.
1. Contested conjugality? Sinhalese marriage practices in eighteenth-century Dutch colonial Sri Lanka
2. Subaltern Lives
3. Banishment and Belonging
4. –10012. Missive sent by the governor and the Political Council of Ceylon to the Heren XVII, containing a general description of Ceylon compiled for the governor-general and the councils of the VOC, 31 January 1788.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献