Examining the effect of exit separation on aircraft evacuation performance during 90-second certification trials using evacuation modelling techniques

Author:

Blake S. J.,Galea E. R.,Gwynne S.,Lawrence P. J.,Filippidis L.

Abstract

AbstractThis paper examines the influence of exit separation, exit availability and seating configuration on aircraft evacuation efficiency and evacuation time. The purpose of this analysis is to explore how these parameters influence the 60-foot exit separation requirement found in aircraft certification rules. The analysis makes use of the airEXODUS evacuation model and is based on a typical wide-body aircraft cabin section involving two pairs of Type-A exits located at either end of the section with a maximum permissible loading of 220 passengers located between the exits. The analysis reveals that there is a complex relationship between exit separation and evacuation efficiency. A main finding of this work is that for the cabin section examined, with a maximum passenger load of 220 and under certification conditions, exit separations up to 170ft will result in approximately constant total evacuation times and average personal evacuation times. This practical exit separation threshold is decreased to 114ft if another combination of exits is selected. While other factors must also be considered when determining maximum allowable exit separations, these results suggest it is not possible to mandate a maximum exit separation without taking into consideration exit type, exit availability and aircraft configuration.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Aerospace Engineering

Reference16 articles.

1. Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), Federal Aviation Regulations, 1999, Washington, USA.

2. AASK — Aircraft accident statistical knowledge: a database of human experience in evacuation reports;Owen;Aeronaut J,1998

3. FAR Part 25.807 Airworthiness standards: transport category airplanes including amendment 25–67, Federal Register, 16 June, 1989, Washington, USA.

4. Galea, E.R. , Blake, S.J. and Gwynne, S. Validating the airEXODUS evacuation model using derivative wide and narrow bodied data from certification trials, UK CAA report in preparation.

5. JAR Section 1 Part 25.807, Large aeroplanes: subpart D design and construction, Joint Aviation Requirements (Change 15), 2001.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3